philosophy

Wanderley J. Jr Blacksmith Philosophy? FE-UFG. Introduction: Previous characterization of the existence human being while opening in and for the world. To reflect on the death of the desire of filosofar and the instrumentalizao of the language in the Age of the Technique is, in last analysis, to place in question a specific being, who we ourselves we are to each moment? the man, while -there to be played in the world, without justifications, so that or reason, one to be simply there, debtor to choose. A being who, most of the time, in its daily existence if loses in each one of its choices, crystallizing itself in a way of to be inautntico under the dictatorship of Impersonal Of the Man, it hinders that it to keep a more essential relation with the language, the proper things and I obtain exactly.

In two you celebrate tickets, the German philosopher Martin Heidegger (1989-1976) looks for to show to us what it constitutes the true one to be of the man. The first one is one citation of Antgone de present Sfocles in the Introduction to metaphysics 1935 (Cf. HEIDEGGER, 1969). To another ticket is one fbula extracted of the Fbulas de Higino, it was cited in 42 of Being and Time, and would express an understanding daily pay-ontolgica of the man as well-taken care of, cure? unificante structure that congregates all the ways of being of the man with the things and the others, and that it marks its finitude as be-for-death. Cf.

HEIDEGGER, 1964, 42. In the Antigona de Sflocles, the choir sings: ‘ ‘ Many are the strange things, nothing, however, it has of more strange of what the man. Part on foam of the high water in the way of the storm it southern winter and crosses vacant mountains, that open anger abysses.

The method based for the semiotics if constituted through verbal sources (focal groups) by means of interview. E, to say itself of this importance of the communication and the use of the radiofnica language was, also, permissible the search of comparison between the programs goes up cited. Beyond the study on the ideologies of the language and the speech and its power of persuasion we made comparisons of the language, transmitted for the programs; analysis of the profile of the listener and the characteristic of the information and its degree of importance/seduction. We also observe the relevance of the facts in the context and as the listeners if they arrest for the question of the hearing – as unconsciously they are motivated to this. We will also show, as the direct information appears emphasizing the daily Real of the people, omissive ahead of the facts who shock the society, not perceiving the subtle invasion, indirectly, seen for a form of social repression that is not preset by legal organizations. But, that ahead of the neutrality it imprisons the points of view, of which many of them if do not feel free to explicitar its details, that is, to display its opinions, for fearing the represrias. We have knowledge of that, today, some projects already had been servant, as half to insert the radio also to the reach of the education, also, already it exists partnerships and programs that develop this type of work through the comunitris radios. We can cite NCE USP? as Nucleus of communication and Education of So Paulo that develops the Educomunicao work, visa of this form, the radio is had as center of a category that spreads culture/knowledge. Not obstante, all this apparatus of information and knowledge that can be transmitted through the radio we will not be able to forget that it is fruit of a social project, therefore, to mention its positive points fronts the community is something that becomes sufficiently relative and depends only on the category of radio that if is speaking.

In such a way we have the following association: civilization, science, history that results in inaquality and makes with that the man sees itself not as are in itself as it seems to be. To search gnese of the man requires an effort in transposing the representative speech of the civilization (science and history) and going until the nature. In the present work we will search to study the thought of Rousseau on science and history, being shown that both are the service of the civilization. We intend to show that the pretension of science to consist as truth paradigm nothing more is of what a social construction, then the notion to know true is a representation, a mask that cannot be off of the moral. Our study it will be developed in three chapters: 1 Science and Appearance, 2 Science: a problem, 3 History: process and science. Science and Appearance.

The benefits that the scientific progress brought to the society are seen nowadays as unquestioned facts. Facts these that reflect ‘ ‘ beno’ ‘ that it is the establishment of the technician-scientific kingdom. As that in consequence of this the scientific knowledge gains the statute (dogmtico) of truth. Until point the conception of that the scientific truths with its advances had been absolutely beneficial? Until point and where felt the progress was and is capable to become the human being better? Many times we forget that scientific knowing it bore fruit in ‘ ‘ bero’ ‘ of the society and this that one is creates. It has soul relation between society (sociability) and science. Rousseau does not want leaving to forget in them this linking, it criticizes scientific knowing conceived while guard and promoter of the truth, therefore understand that this to know, been born of the viscera of the society does not have as to base truths of absolute character, since indelvel of relativity brings obtains the mark and the meaning of this is in ‘ ‘ that the men had had to use, for the establishment of the society, light that was only developed in the seio of sociedade’ ‘ , he affirms Rousseau in ‘ ‘ second discurso’ ‘ (1988, P.